🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Legal Matter

The federal appeals court decided on Tuesday that it would rehear the case concerning the president’s authority with an expanded group of 11 judges. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that federal officials at the immigration center in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities assert that local officers have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, residents have been posting footage of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in Portland issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federal control of the state troops, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the first order by mobilizing troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of state troops – but the second ruling remained in place, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under consideration together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The founding document restricts the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this case progresses and our legal battle continues in the courts.”