🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard females from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The final authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially return the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect comparable discussions in other member states