🔗 Share this article

Shutdowns are a repeat feature in American political life – however this one feels particularly intractable because of shifting political forces and deep-seated animosity among both major parties.

Some government services are temporarily suspended, and about 750,000 employees likely to be placed on unpaid leave as Republicans and Democrats remain unable to reach consensus regarding budget legislation.

Votes aimed at ending the deadlock have repeatedly failed, and it is hard to see an off-ramp this time because both parties – including the nation's leader – can see some merit in maintaining their positions.

These are several key factors in which things feel different in 2025.

First, For Democrats, the focus is on Trump – not just healthcare

Democratic supporters have insisted for months that their party adopt stronger opposition against the Trump administration. Well now Democratic leaders has a chance to demonstrate they have listened.

Earlier this year, Senate leader was fiercely criticised after supporting a Republican spending bill thus preventing a shutdown in the spring. This time he's holding firm.

This presents an opportunity for Democrats to demonstrate they can take back some control from an administration pursuing its agenda assertively with determined action.

Refusing to back the GOP budget proposal comes with political risk that the wider public will grow frustrated with prolonged negotiations and impacts accumulate.

Democratic representatives are leveraging the shutdown fight to highlight concerns about expiring health insurance subsidies together with Republican-approved government healthcare cuts affecting low-income populations, both facing public opposition.

They are also trying to curtail executive utilization of his executive powers to rescind or withhold money authorized legislatively, which he has done with foreign aid and other programmes.

Second, For Republicans, they see potential

The President and one of his key officials have made little secret their perspective that they smell a chance to make more of reductions to the federal workforce that have featured the current presidential term so far.

The President himself stated recently that the shutdown had afforded him an "unprecedented opportunity", adding he intended to reduce funding for "opposition-supported departments".

The White House said it would be left with the "unenviable task" involving significant workforce reductions to maintain critical federal operations should the impasse persist. An administration spokesperson said this was just "budgetary responsibility".

The scope of the potential lay-offs is still uncertain, but the White House has been in discussions with the Office of Management and Budget, the budgeting office, which is headed by the key official.

The budget director has already announced the suspension of federal funding for regions governed by the opposition party, such as NYC and Illinois' largest city.

Third, Trust Is Lacking on either side

Whereas past government closures have been characterised by late-night talks between the two parties aimed at restoring federal operations, currently there seems minimal cooperative willingness of collaboration this time.

Instead, animosity prevails. The bad blood persisted recently, as both sides exchanging accusations regarding the deadlock's origin.

The legislative leader a Republican, charged opposition members with insufficient commitment toward resolution, and maintaining positions during discussions "to get political cover".

Meanwhile, the Senate leader levelled the same accusation against their counterparts, saying that a Republican promise regarding health funding talks after operations resume cannot be trusted.

The President himself has escalated tensions through sharing a controversial AI-generated image featuring the opposition leader along with another senior in the House, in which the legislator is depicted with traditional headwear and a moustache.

The affected legislator and other Democrats denounced this as discriminatory, which was denied by the Vice-President.

4. The US economy faces vulnerability

Analysts expect about 40% of government employees – more than 800,000 people – to be put on unpaid leave due to the government closure.

This will reduce consumer expenditure – with broader economic consequences, as environmental permitting, patent approvals, interrupted vendor payments and other kinds of federal operations tied to business comes to a halt.

A shutdown also injects fresh instability within economic systems currently experiencing disruption from multiple factors including trade measures, earlier cuts to government spending, enforcement actions and artificial intelligence.

Analysts estimate potential reduction of approximately 0.2% off US economic growth for each week it lasts.

But the economy typically recoups most of that lost activity after a shutdown ends, as it would after disruption after major environmental events.

This might explain partially why financial markets have shown limited reaction by the current stand-off.

On the other hand, experts indicate should the President carries out proposed significant workforce reductions, the damage could be more long-lasting.